mirrors/deCloudflare
1
0
Fork 0
mirror of https://0xacab.org/dCF/deCloudflare.git synced 2025-01-15 19:57:11 -05:00
Code Issues Actions Packages Projects Releases Wiki Activity

commit

Browse Source
This commit is contained in:
CF 2022-04-30 21:30:08 +00:00 committed by #deCloudflare
parent 9713820ce3
commit eb0b87613f
1 changed files with 1 additions and 0 deletions
Show Stats Download Patch File Download Diff File Expand all files Collapse all files

1
subfiles/people/2022.mastodon.md
View File

@ -1,5 +1,6 @@
## Mastodon
- @com @jerry So I wonder if using Cloudflare actually eased their effort in passing an audit, because they can probably tick a bunch of boxes that say “not our problem… that’s on Cloudflare’s side of the fence”. ([bojkotiMalbona@infosec.exchange](https://infosec.exchange/@bojkotiMalbona/108221845275233039))
- Someone who sees DeepL’s security statement would be convinced that they are in good hands if they knew nothing about Cloudflare -- which likely describes a majority of those who encounter DeepL. ([bojkotiMalbona@infosec.exchange](https://infosec.exchange/@bojkotiMalbona/108219864107489894))
- I can understand why DeepL is so driven to mislead users about their security -- it’s a profit-driven corporation. But why does the LibreTranslate.com admin mislead users about security? They don’t even have a donation link. They have no reason to be malicious & harm the “libre” brand. It would cost them nothing to warn users that all queries are shared with Cloudflare. ([bojkotiMalbona@infosec.exchange](https://infosec.exchange/@bojkotiMalbona/108219905100511124))
- DeepL’s use of Cloudflare whilst showcasing ISO 27001 compliance really demonstrates well the insufficiency of iso27001. DeepL shows how well a Cloudflare website can decorate the security disclosures of a service while sharing every bit of everyone’s data with a MitM. ([bojkotiMalbona@infosec.exchange](https://infosec.exchange/@bojkotiMalbona/108219851714554080))